The West Is Falling, One Politician at a Time
In 1995, when the United States put Omar Abdel-Rahman on trial for the seditious conspiracy behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the first jihadist strike on American soil, six dead, more than a thousand wounded, a young man came forward as a witness for his defense. He had met the Blind Sheikh in 1991. He had translated for him, visited his home, driven thirteen hours to sit with him at an Islamic conference. On the stand, he testified to soften the case against the cleric whose followers had just bombed Lower Manhattan.
This same Abdel-Rahman was the man who, years earlier, issued the fatwa that declared Anwar Sadat an apostate for making peace with Israel, the religious ruling that sent Sadat to his death.
That young man was Adam Hamawy. This week, the Democratic Party of New Jersey made him their nominee for Congress, in a district so safe it has not elected a Republican since 1994. He is endorsed by Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib.
Last year it was Mamdani. This year it is Hamawy in New Jersey and another candidate in Michigan. Each one fluent in the language of the West, civil rights, inclusion, social justice, the whole liberal vocabulary, and each one carried into power on the shoulders of the useful idiots.
In 2008, in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism-financing trial, federal prosecutors entered into evidence a 1991 internal memorandum of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America. It described the Brotherhood’s work in America in its own words: a “grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” to be carried out by the hands of Americans themselves, through their own institutions. Not by bombs. By patience, by infiltration, by the slow capture of the very freedoms the West offers, and by the useful idiots who hold the door open and call anyone who notices a bigot.
Below is the demographic model that explains how this works, stage by stage, as Muslim populations grow inside a non-Muslim society. I first published it some time ago. I’m sending it again now, hoping more people will open their eyes to what’s happening.
The Demographic Blueprint of Islamic Expansion
Dr. Peter Hammond, in his work Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat, outlined a demographic model that continues to resonate across Western societies grappling with the challenges of multiculturalism. His thesis is that the behavioral patterns of Muslim populations in non-Muslim countries change predictably based on their percentage of the total population, and these shifts are not incidental or cultural but theological and systemic. They mirror Islam’s built-in ideological programming, which moves from passive tolerance to assertive dominance as numbers increase.
0–2%
When Muslims constitute less than 2% of the population, they typically maintain a low profile. This is the stage of da’wah, Islamic proselytization, and reputation-building. Islam is presented to the host society as peaceful, rational, and ethical. The focus is on integration, tolerance, and charitable outreach. Criticism of Islam is dismissed as ignorance or Islamophobia, while the community builds its infrastructure, mosques, community centers, and Islamic schools.